The first step in selecting environmentally responsible sealing solutions is to define the term, environmentally responsible. This is not as straightforward as it sounds, since it can be defined in regulatory terms, by corporate policy, or by moral and ethical standards. The term can also be extended to include resource conservation, as well as emissions reduction. Fluid sealing devices play a critical role in a wide range of processing industries, including chemicals, refining, pulp and paper and many others. In this role, they variously keep pumps from leaking, valves from releasing emissions, flanges from spraying fluids and other undesirable and often dangerous conditions. The process of selecting the environmentally responsible sealing solution for any given application begins with defining the expected level of performance and service conditions. In the process of delivering satisfactory environmental performance, it should help improve overall process productivity and reduce or eliminate damage to plant and equipment, downtime, lost production and non-compliance penalties. It should also help conserve raw materials and the energy it requires to operate the process. A holistic approach to environmentally responsible sealing solutions is based on the regulations and standards of various agencies such as the FDA, EPA, USP, 3A and others. Compliance with these regulations often calls for sealing effectiveness to the ppm level, and most sealing manufacturers can provide certificates of conformance for their products. In some applications, particularly refineries, the sealing solution must also be fire-safe or fire-resistant for flammable fluid service.
12/17/2011
Figure 1. Leaking valve stems account for 60 percent of fugitive emissions, followed by pumps, compressors, drains, flanges and relief valves.
Containment of these emissions is governed by law, which the EPA enforces. Beyond complying with the letter of the law, environmental responsibility calls for taking to heart the spirit of the law-proactively finding, minimizing and ideally stopping harmful substances from entering the air.
The Kyoto Protocol has brought into sharp focus the need to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) from our industrial processes. Yet many VOCs and HAPs are many times more potent GHGs than much maligned carbon dioxide. Standards such as API 622, ISO 15848, TA-Luft and others address the ability of packing and gaskets to achieve low levels of fugitive emissions.
Figure 2. This rotary shaft sealing system is designed to replace mechanical seals in pumping applications. Its dry, no-dilution performance minimizes water consumption.
Figure 3. This chart graphically demonstrates the dramatic reduction in power consumption by using bearing isolators in pump and valve applications.
Indeed, conservation is the highest form of environmental responsibility. It is the responsibility of the sealing industry to provide solutions that minimize or eliminate the environmental impact of the systems in which they are installed. At the same time, however, they also must meet the productivity requirements of the companies that use them. The products to meet these seemingly incompatible, but actually complementary, objectives are either already available, in development or being formulated in someone's laboratory.